feat: microservice architecture

This commit is contained in:
2025-11-05 09:12:34 +01:00
parent 54a047f5dc
commit 65a428534c
354 changed files with 5544 additions and 13141 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
# ADR-0030: Service Communication Strategy
## Status
Accepted
## Context
Services need to communicate with each other in a microservices architecture. All communication must go through well-defined interfaces that support network calls.
## Decision
Use a **service client-based communication strategy**:
1. **Service Client Interfaces** (Primary for synchronous calls):
- Define interfaces in `pkg/services/` for all services
- All implementations are network-based:
- `internal/services/grpc/client/` - gRPC clients (primary)
- `internal/services/http/client/` - HTTP clients (fallback)
2. **Event Bus** (Primary for asynchronous communication):
- Distributed via Kafka
- Preferred for cross-service communication
- Event-driven architecture for loose coupling
3. **Shared Infrastructure** (For state):
- Redis for cache and distributed state
- PostgreSQL for persistent data
- Kafka for events
## Service Client Pattern
```go
// Interface in pkg/services/
type IdentityServiceClient interface {
GetUser(ctx context.Context, id string) (*User, error)
CreateUser(ctx context.Context, user *User) (*User, error)
}
// gRPC implementation (primary)
type grpcIdentityClient struct {
conn *grpc.ClientConn
client pb.IdentityServiceClient
}
// HTTP implementation (fallback)
type httpIdentityClient struct {
baseURL string
httpClient *http.Client
}
```
## Development Mode
For local development, multiple services can run in the same process, but they still communicate via service clients (gRPC or HTTP) - no direct in-process calls. This ensures the architecture is consistent.
## Consequences
### Positive
- **Unified Interface**: Consistent interface across all services
- **Easy Testing**: Can mock service clients
- **Type Safety**: gRPC provides type-safe contracts
- **Clear Boundaries**: Service boundaries are explicit
- **Scalability**: Services can be scaled independently
### Negative
- **Network Overhead**: All calls go over network
- **Interface Evolution**: Changes require coordination
- **Versioning**: Need service versioning strategy
- **Development Complexity**: More setup required for local development
## Implementation
- All services use gRPC clients (primary)
- HTTP clients as fallback option
- Service registry for service discovery
- Circuit breakers and retries for resilience